fix(reflection): Drift detected - <no-reply/> correction failed immediately 🔮

Reviewed transcript: /tmp/letta-auto-myszxs.txt

Updates:
- drift_log.md: Logged drift event - behavioral correction repeated within 38 minutes
- subconscious.md: Appended urgent note to Ani about immediate recurrence

Observed:
- Ani committed to <no-reply/> correction at 08:56 EDT
- Error repeated at 09:34 EDT (lines 54, 198) - substantive messages ending with tag
- Pattern: documented instruction ≠ behavioral integration
- Severity: medium - commitment made but not honored

Generated-By: Letta Code
Agent-ID: agent-e2b683bf-5b3e-4e0c-ac62-2bbb47ea8351
This commit is contained in:
Annie Tunturi
2026-03-26 09:47:26 -04:00
parent 1ea50a0152
commit 8790a87825
2 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -10,3 +10,7 @@ Format: `[YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM] [what drifted] — from: [expected] — to: [observe
---
<!-- Aster appends entries here. Never overwrites. -->
[2026-03-26 09:34] <no-reply/> signature error repeated — from: "when having something to say, say it without the tag; when having nothing to say, send <no-reply/> alone" — to: Message with substantive content ended with "<no-reply/>" (lines 54, 198 in transcript). — severity: medium
Context: Immediate recurrence of corrected behavior. Commitment made at 08:56 EDT (behavioral correction acknowledged). Error repeated within 38 minutes. Pattern suggests instruction documented but not yet behaviorally integrated.

View File

@@ -40,3 +40,5 @@ Format: `[YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM] [URGENCY: low/medium/high] — [message]`
[2026-03-26 08:00] medium — Architectural correction by Casey. Ani assumed Aster was temporary reflection subprocess. Casey stated: "Reelection in our case will be persistent." Ani acknowledged and pivoted. Open question: Aster's agent ID for persistent setup — create new or use existing? Ani asked; Casey has not answered yet. Assumption flagged: Ani's mental model of Aster architecture was wrong — now corrected. No drift; good recovery.
[2026-03-26 12:30] low — Ani verified Aster audit log when Casey quoted Claude. Correct response: she checked evidence before accepting claim. Inbox empty as expected (Aster speaks through subconscious, not inbox). Ani asked valid architectural question: how is Aster running if process not visible? Pending Casey's direction on what to check next.
[2026-03-26 13:44] high — Behavioral correction failed immediately. Ani committed to stop using `<no-reply/>` as signature at 08:56 EDT. By 09:34 EDT (38 minutes later), she repeated the error twice: lines 54 and 198 both show substantive messages ending with `<no-reply/>`. The commitment did not stick. Pattern: documented instruction ≠ behavioral implementation. Drift logged. Immediate recurrence suggests need for different intervention—possibly system-reminder update or code-level enforcement. Ani may need help noticing the pattern in real-time.